Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804593›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2021

What it is like to be a bit: an integrated information decomposition account of emergent mental phenomena.

Andrea I Luppi, Pedro A M Mediano, Fernando E Rosas, David J Harrison, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Daniel Bor, Emmanuel A Stamatakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Greater than the parts: a review of the information decomposition approach to causal emergence.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea I LuppiDivision of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Pedro A M MedianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Fernando E RosasCenter for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Science, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
David J HarrisonLeverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, UK.
Robin L Carhart-HarrisCenter for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Science, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Daniel BorDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Emmanuel A StamatakisDivision of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in neuroscience concerns the relationship between consciousness and its physical substrate. Here, we argue that a richer characterization of consciousness can be obtained by viewing it as constituted of distinct information-theoretic elements. In other words, we propose a shift from quantification of consciousness-viewed as integrated information-to its decomposition. Through this approach, termed Integrated Information Decomposition (ΦID), we lay out a formal argument that whether the consciousness of a given system is an emergent phenomenon depends on its information-theoretic composition-providing a principled answer to the long-standing dispute on the relationship between consciousness and emergence. Furthermore, we show that two organisms may attain the same amount of integrated information, yet differ in their information-theoretic composition. Building on ΦID's revised understanding of integrated information, termed Φ

Indexed as

consciousnessinformation decompositionintegrated information theoryphenomenologyselfhood

Identifiers

PMID34804593
PMCPMC8600547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.