ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2021
Predicting flows through microfluidic circuits with fluid walls.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confinement by Liquid-Liquid Interface Replicates In Vivo Neutrophil Deformations and Elicits Bleb-Based Migration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Detection of inertial effects in capillary flows in open and closed channels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Stable diffusion gradients in microfluidic conduits bounded by fluid walls.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Flow in fetoplacental-like microvessels in vitro enhances perfusion, barrier function, and matrix stability.Science advances · 2023Article
- A platform for modular assembly and feeding of micro-organoids on standard Petri dishes.Biology open · 2023Article
- Reconfigurable Microfluidic Circuits for Isolating and Retrieving Cells of Interest.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aqueous phase in traditional microfluidics is usually confined by solid walls; flows through such systems are often predicted accurately. As solid walls limit access, open systems are being developed in which the aqueous phase is partly bounded by fluid walls (interfaces with air or immiscible liquids). Such fluid walls morph during flow due to pressure gradients, so predicting flow fields remains challenging. We recently developed a version of open microfluidics suitable for live-cell biology in which the aqueous phase is confined by an interface with an immiscible and bioinert fluorocarbon (FC40). Here, we find that common medium additives (fetal bovine serum, serum replacement) induce elastic no-slip boundaries at this interface and develop a semi-analytical model to predict flow fields. We experimentally validate the model's accuracy for single conduits and fractal vascular trees and demonstrate how flow fields and shear stresses can be controlled to suit individual applications in cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.