Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804543›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2021

Experimental evidence for the benefits of higher X-ray energies for macromolecular crystallography.

Selina L S Storm, Danny Axford, Robin L Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifying and avoiding radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Variability in X-ray induced effects in [Rh(COD)Cl]Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selina L S StormDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9223-5576
Danny AxfordDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-8525
Robin L OwenDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-7057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray-induced radiation damage is a limiting factor for the macromolecular crystallographer and data must often be merged from many crystals to yield complete data sets for the structure solution of challenging samples. Increasing the X-ray energy beyond the typical 10-15 keV range promises to provide an extension of crystal lifetime via an increase in diffraction efficiency. To date, however, hardware limitations have negated any possible gains. Through the first use of a cadmium telluride EIGER2 detector and a beamline optimized for high-energy data collection, it is shown that at higher energies fewer crystals will be required to obtain complete data, as the diffracted intensity per unit dose increases by a factor of more than two between 12.4 and 25 keV. Additionally, these higher energy data can provide more information, as shown by a systematic increase in the high-resolution cutoff of the data collected. Taken together, these gains point to a high-energy future for synchrotron-based macromolecular crystallography.

Indexed as

high-energy X-raysmacromolecular crystallographyX-ray radiation damage

Identifiers

PMID34804543
PMCPMC8562668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.