ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2021
Mixed serous and mucinous retroperitoneal cystadenoma: an extremely rare case.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: A case report with review of literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed serous and mucinous retroperitoneal cyst adenoma is an extremely rare condition as most of the reported cases in the literature are primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenomas and primary retroperitoneal serous cystadenomas. They are initially asymptomatic and become symptomatic gradually depending on their size and anatomical extension and location. We report a 49-year-old woman with a history of right-side abdomen pain for a few years. Diagnostic images revealed a large retroperitoneal cystic lesion. A laparoscopic resection was performed without spillage. The patient was discharged without complication postoperatively and no recurrence on follow-up. Surgical excision, either open/or laparoscopic without any spillage, remains the most effective and appropriate treatment for this lesion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.