Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804464›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2021

Efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qing An, Shuwen Su, Yan Tu, Lingfeng Gao, Gaopeng Xian, Yujia Bai, Qiong Zhan, Xingbo Xu, Dingli Xu, Qingchun Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qing AnState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-2652
Shuwen SuState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China.
Yan TuState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingfeng GaoState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China.
Gaopeng XianState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China.
Yujia BaiState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China.
Qiong ZhanState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, China.
Xingbo XuDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center of Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Dingli XuState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, 1838 Northern Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Qingchun ZengState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, First Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, 1838 Northern Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-8237
Nanfang Hospital · CNUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs)

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases and ClinicalTrials.gov website (through 21 October 2020) was performed. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using random-effects models.

resultsTwelve studies (two studies were randomized controlled trials) comprising 6943 patients were included (5299 had indications for oral anticoagulation (OAC) and 1644 had none). No significant differences were found between NOACs and the standard care in the incidences of all stroke, a composite endpoint, and major/life-threatening bleeding. NOACs were associated with lower all-cause mortality than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in post-TAVR patients with indications for OAC after more than 1 year of follow-up [RR = 0.64; 95% CI, (0.42, 0.96);

conclusionsIn patients with indications for OAC, post-TAVR antithrombotic therapy with NOACs was more favorable due to its lower all-cause mortality after more than 1 year of follow-up. In those without indications for OAC, NOACs presented poorer outcomes due to its higher all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

APTmeta-analysisNOACsTAVRVKAs

Identifiers

PMID34804464
PMCPMC8600552
OpenAlexW3160410877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.