Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804398›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2021

Teaching methods fostering enjoyment and creativity in medical education.

Jonathan Kopel, Gregory Brower, John W Culberson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Playfulness: Confronting Resident Disengagement in Psychiatry Training.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virtual Reality-based Methods for Training Novice Electrophysiology Trainees-A Pilot Study.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan KopelHealth Sciences Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-2695
Gregory BrowerHealth Sciences Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
John W CulbersonFamily Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The journey towards becoming a physician has always been a test of diligence and patience in perfecting the science and art of treating patients. This learning continues well-beyond medical school, requiring a life-long pursuit for acquiring and refining medical knowledge with advances in science and technology. After completing medical school and residency, however, many clinicians report feelings of dissatisfaction and disillusionment with their career path citing lack of autonomy, increased government regulations, and long hours. Although a complex challenge, encouraging creativity and enjoyment during medical education can provide future physicians new skills to advance their medical knowledge while maintaining their personal satisfaction and enjoyment. In this article, we examine examples of how empowering medical education to be enjoyable provides the foundation for producing healthier and more engaged clinicians in the workforce and beyond.

Indexed as

Medical educationsimulationsteaching methods and USMLE

Identifiers

PMID34804398
PMCPMC8604480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.