Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804391›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2021

Comparative effectiveness of erythropoietin alpha and beta in hemodialysis patients: a single-center prospective observational study.

Muhammad Nadeem Ahsan, Naila Asif, Shafqat Waqar Khanzada, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Farah Yasmin, Faran Khalid, Shameen Fareed, Syeda Ghazala Irshad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug Utilization Evaluation of Erythropoietin at a Referral Teaching Hospital in Iran.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Nadeem AhsanDepartment of Nephrology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Naila AsifDepartment of Nephrology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shafqat Waqar KhanzadaDepartment of Nephrology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-2030
Farah YasminInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-6140
Faran KhalidInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shameen FareedDepartment of Nephrology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syeda Ghazala IrshadInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKLiaquat National Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAnemia is a prevalent complication endured by patients with chronic renal disease. Renal anemia also leads to the development of cardio-vascular complications. Epoetin alpha and beta are recombinant human erythropoietin prioritized for managing anemia in hemodialysis patients. The current study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of both erythropoietin alpha and erythropoietin beta in treating renal anemia. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in a Renal Dialysis Centre at a tertiary care Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan for a period of 3 months. The two erythropoietin products used were human recombinant erythropoietin alpha (Tropin®) and erythropoietin beta (Recormon®). Both groups were age-matched, BMI, eGFR, gender, and comorbidities like diabetes and hypertension were indifferent. The comparative analysis was performed after the completion of 3 months.

resultsA total of 94 participants were included in the analysis, 54 in group A and 40 in group B. Mean albumin, urea, creatinine, ferritin, iron, and transferrin saturation at inclusion were statistically insignificant, TIBC was higher in group A (p = 0.005) and CRP levels were slightly higher in group B (p = 0.050). There was significant improvement in Hb level (p = 0.025), PCV (p = 0.001), and RBC count (p = 0.007) in group B. While in group A, there was significantly increased MCV (p = 0.005) and MCHC (p = 0.002). In intention to treat analysis, 22.2% of subjects in group A and 40.0% in group B reached desired Hb levels of ≥11 g/l after 3 months.

conclusionIn our assessment of hemodialysis patients, erythropoietin beta was found more effective than erythropoietin alpha.

Indexed as

anemiaCKDdialysiserythropoietinESRDhemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID34804391
PMCPMC8604461
OpenAlexW3213991024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.