Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804317›Full record

ArticleScanning2021

Thermochemical Recycling of Oily Sludge by Catalytic Pyrolysis: A Review.

Xiaojing Di, Haodan Pan, Donghao Li, Hongxiang Hu, Zhiyong Hu, Yulin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scanning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaojing DiCollege of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113301, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-2145
Haodan PanCollege of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113301, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-0814
Donghao LiCollege of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113301, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-6678
Hongxiang HuCAS Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-6565
Zhiyong HuCollege of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113301, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-6070
Yulin YanThe Shale Oil Plant of Fushun Mining Group Co., Ltd., Fushun 113115, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main methods of treating oily sludge at home and abroad and the current research status of oily sludge pyrolysis technology are briefly described, and four commonly used catalysts are introduced: metals, metal compounds, molecular sieves, metal-supported molecular sieves, and biomass catalysts for oily sludge. The influence of pyrolysis, the pyrolysis mechanism, and the product composition of oily sludge with the addition of different catalysts are also discussed. Finally, the development direction of preparing new catalysts and the mixed use of multiple catalysts is proposed as a theory to provide for the efficient and reasonable utilization of oily sludge.

Identifiers

PMID34804317
PMCPMC8572630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.