Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804076›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Enhancing Natural Killer Cell Targeting of Pediatric Sarcoma.

Natacha Omer, Wayne Nicholls, Bronte Ruegg, Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, Gustavo Rodrigues Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natacha OmerThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute (UQDI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wayne NichollsOncology Services Group, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Bronte RueggThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute (UQDI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Fernando Souza-Fonseca-GuimaraesThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute (UQDI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gustavo Rodrigues RossiThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute (UQDI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma (EWS), and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are the most common pediatric sarcomas. Conventional therapy for these sarcomas comprises neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection of the primary tumor and/or radiation therapy. Patients with metastatic, relapsed, or refractory tumors have a dismal prognosis due to resistance to these conventional therapies. Therefore, innovative therapeutic interventions, such as immunotherapy, are urgently needed. Recently, cancer research has focused attention on natural killer (NK) cells due their innate ability to recognize and kill tumor cells. Osteosarcoma, EWS and RMS, are known to be sensitive to NK cell cytotoxicity

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesBone NeoplasmsChildCytotoxicity, ImmunologicGraft vs Tumor EffectHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationOsteosarcomaRhabdomyosarcomaSarcoma, EwingAntibodiesEwing sarcomaimmunotherapynatural killerosteosarcomarhabdomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID34804076
PMCPMC8600077
OpenAlexW3212154078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.