Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Towards Real-Time and Affordable Strain-Level Metagenomics-Based Foodborne Outbreak Investigations Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technologies.

Florence E Buytaers, Assia Saltykova, Sarah Denayer, Bavo Verhaegen, Kevin Vanneste, Nancy H C Roosens, Denis Piérard, Kathleen Marchal, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative metagenomics using a portable protocol.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Rainfall-Driven Mobilisation of Clinically RelevantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Detection ofFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Nanopore sequencing in veterinary medicine: from concepts to clinical applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florence E BuytaersTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Assia SaltykovaTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Sarah DenayerNational Reference Laboratory for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (NRL STEC), Foodborne Pathogens, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Bavo VerhaegenNational Reference Laboratory for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (NRL STEC), Foodborne Pathogens, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin VannesteTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Nancy H C RoosensTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Denis PiérardNational Reference Center for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (NRC STEC), Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Kathleen MarchalDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sigrid C J De KeersmaeckerTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current routine laboratory practices to investigate food samples in case of foodborne outbreaks still rely on attempts to isolate the pathogen in order to characterize it. We present in this study a proof of concept using Shiga toxin-producing

Indexed as

Flonglefood surveillancemetagenomicsnanoporeoutbreakSNP analysisSTECstrain-level

Identifiers

PMID34803953
PMCPMC8602914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.