Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Methods to Develop an

José Ramón Gutiérrez-Casares, Javier Quintero, Guillem Jorba, Valentin Junet, Vicente Martínez, Tamara Pozo-Rubio, Baldomero Oliva, Xavier Daura, José Manuel Mas, Carmen Montoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

José Ramón Gutiérrez-CasaresUnidad Ambulatoria de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental de la Infancia, Niñez y Adolescencia, Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Badajoz, Spain.
Javier QuinteroServicio de Psiquiatría, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Guillem JorbaAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Valentin JunetAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Vicente MartínezMedical Department, Takeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Tamara Pozo-RubioMedical Department, Takeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Baldomero OlivaResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier DauraInstitute of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
José Manuel MasAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen MontotoMedical Department, Takeda Farmacéutica España, Madrid, Spain.
Anaxomics (Spain) · ESHospital Perpetuo Socorro · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESPompeu Fabra University · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory agencies encourage computer modeling and simulation to reduce the time and cost of clinical trials. Although still not classified in formal guidelines, system biology-based models represent a powerful tool for generating hypotheses with great molecular detail. Herein, we have applied a mechanistic head-to-head

Indexed as

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderin silico clinical triallisdexamfetaminemathematical modelingmethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID34803764
PMCPMC8595241
OpenAlexW3208500803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.