ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Brolucizumab in the Real-Life Clinical Practice.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Review
- Tackling visual impairment: emerging avenues in ophthalmology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- First-year real-world experience of intravitreal brolucizumab injection for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Factors Affecting Disease Stability After Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection for Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Scleritis following intravitreal brolucizumab injection: a case series.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- One-year outcome of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Japanese patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Functional and anatomical outcomes of brolucizumab for nAMD in a real-life setting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anti-angiogenic and antioxidant effects of axitinib in human retinal endothelial cells: implications in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one year real-life results with intravitreal Brolucizumab.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Brolucizumab Intravitreal Injections for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Real-Life Study on a Cohort of Italian Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Brolucizumab in Pretreated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Short-Term Treatment Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicentre Indian Real-World Evidence Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- First Year Real Life Experience With Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Treatment of Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To report the early efficacy and safety outcomes of treatment with intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (IVT-B) in patients presenting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a tertiary clinical setting. A retrospective case series of patients that received IVT-B with a minimum of two injections performed and at least 4 weeks of follow-up after last injection. Nineteen eyes of 19 patients were included. The number of IVT-B performed for the whole cohort was 58 injections; the mean number of IVT-B per patient was 3.0 ± 1.0 (range 2-6); the mean follow-up time was 14.4 ± 9.0 weeks. Mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR and at the last follow-up was 0.4 ± 0.6 logMAR (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.