Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803584›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss.

Marcello Maniglia, Kristina M Visscher, Aaron R Seitz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05904444 (The Effect of Duration Between Sessions on Microperimetric Biofeedback Training in Patients With Maculopathies), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05904444 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Duration Between Sessions on Microperimetric Biofeedback Training in Patients With Maculopathies

TypeinterventionalSponsorAier Eye Hospital, GuangzhouRan2018 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsMacular Degeneration, Low Vision, Stargardt DiseaseArmsmicroperimetric biofeedback training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical Review: Impact of Central Vision Loss on Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance while Walking.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current directions in visual perceptual learning.Nature reviews psychology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello ManigliaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Kristina M VisscherDepartment of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
University of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologies affecting central vision, and macular degeneration (MD) in particular, represent a growing health concern worldwide, and the leading cause of blindness in the Western World. To cope with the loss of central vision, MD patients often develop compensatory strategies, such as the adoption of a Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL), which they use as a substitute fovea. However, visual acuity and fixation stability in the visual periphery are poorer, leaving many MD patients struggling with tasks such as reading and recognizing faces. Current non-invasive rehabilitative interventions are usually of two types:

Indexed as

clinical intervention strategy perspectivemacular degenerationneural plasticityoculomotor abilitiesperceptual learningvisual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34803584
PMCPMC8599964
OpenAlexW3209786193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.