Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803449›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi2021

Determination of the interaction between the receptor binding domain of 2019-nCoV spike protein, TMPRSS2, cathepsin B and cathepsin L, and glycosidic and aglycon forms of some flavonols.

Erman Salih Istifli, Arzuhan Şihoğlu Tepe, Paulo A Netz, Cengiz Sarikürkcü, İbrahim Halil Kiliç, Bektaş Tepe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comprehensive narrative review ofJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Discovery of novel TMPRSS2 inhibitors for COVID-19 usingInformatics in medicine unlocked · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Erman Salih IstifliCukurova University, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Biology, Adana Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-0703
Arzuhan Şihoğlu TepeKilis 7 Aralık University, Vocational High School of Health Services, Department of Pharmacy Services, Kilis Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-9880
Paulo A NetzTheoretical Chemistry Group, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-0591
Cengiz SarikürkcüAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Afyonkarahisar Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-2520
İbrahim Halil KiliçGaziantep University, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Biology, Gaziantep Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-5131
Bektaş TepeKilis 7 Aralik University, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Kilis Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-5188
Institute of Molecular Medicine · INCukurova University · TRGaziantep University · TRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) is a rapidly spreading disease with a high mortality. In this research, the interactions between specific flavonols and the 2019-nCoV receptor binding domain (RBD), transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and cathepsins (CatB and CatL) were analyzed. According to the relative binding capacity index (RBCI) calculated based on the free energy of binding and calculated inhibition constants, it was determined that robinin (ROB) and gossypetin (GOS) were the most effective flavonols on all targets. While the binding free energy of ROB with the spike glycoprotein RBD, TMPRSS2, CatB, and CatL were -5.02, -7.57, -10.10, and -6.11 kcal/mol, the values for GOS were -4.67, -5.24, -8.31, and -6.76, respectively. Furthermore, both compounds maintained their stability for at least 170 ns on respective targets in molecular dynamics simulations. The molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) calculations also corroborated these data. Considering Lipinski's rule of five, ROB and GOS exhibited 3 (MW>500, N or O>10, NH or OH>5), and 1 (NH or OH>5) violations, respectively. Neither ROB nor GOS showed AMES toxicity or hepatotoxicity. The LD50 of these compounds in rats were 2.482 and 2.527 mol/kg, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that these compounds could be considered as alternative therapeutic agents in the treatment of COVID-19. However, the possible inhibitory effects of these compounds on cytochromes (CYPs) should be verified by in vitro or in vivo tests and their adverse effects on cellular energy metabolism should be minimized by performing molecular modifications if necessary.

Indexed as

2019-nCoVCatBCatLflavonolMM/PBSAmolecular dockingmolecular dynamicsspike glycoproteinTMPRSS2

Identifiers

PMID34803449
PMCPMC8573835
OpenAlexW3196683826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.