Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803419›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Pediatrics2021

Experiences From an Implementation Model of ARI Diagnostic Device in Pneumonia Case Management Among Under-5 Children in Peripheral Healthcare Centers in India.

Harish Kumar, Enisha Sarin, Prasant Saboth, Avinash Jaiswal, Nidhi Chaudhary, Jaya Swarup Mohanty, Nitin Bisht, Shailendra Singh Tomar, Anil Gupta, Ranjan Panda and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harish KumarIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Enisha SarinIPE Global, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-4115
Prasant SabothIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Avinash JaiswalIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Nidhi ChaudharyIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Jaya Swarup MohantyIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Nitin BishtIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Shailendra Singh TomarIPE Global, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-9812
Anil GuptaIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Ranjan PandaIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Rachana PatelIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Arvind KumarIPE Global, New Delhi, India.
Sachin GuptaMaternal Health, USAID India, New Delhi, India.
Varun AlwadhiRam Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo address pneumonia, a major killer of under-5 children in India, a multimodal pulse oximeter was implemented in Health and Wellness Centers. Given the evidence of pulse oximetry in effective pneumonia management and taking into account the inadequate skills of front-line healthcare workers in case management, the device was introduced to help them readily diagnose and treat a child and to examine usability of the device.

designThe implementation was integrated with the routine OPD of primary health centers for 15 months after healthcare workers were provided with an abridged IMNCI training. Monthly facility data was collected to examine case management with the diagnostic device. Feedback on usefulness of the device was obtained.

settingHealth and Wellness Centers (19) of 7 states were selected in consultation with state National Health Mission based on patient footfall.

participantsUnder-5 children presenting with ARI symptoms at the OPD.

resultsOf 4846 children, 0.1% were diagnosed with severe pneumonia and 23% were diagnosed with pneumonia. As per device readings, correct referrals were made of 77.6% of cases of severe pneumonia, and 81% of pneumonia cases were correctly given antibiotics. The Pulse oximeter was highly acceptable among health workers as it helped in timely classification and treatment of pneumonia. It had no maintenance issue and battery was long-lasting.

conclusionPulse oximeter implementation was doable and acceptable among health workers. Together with IMNCI training, PO in primary care settings is a feasible approach to provide equitable care to under-5 children.

Indexed as

Childhood pneumoniafront-line health workerIndiaprimary health carepulse oximeter

Identifiers

PMID34803419
PMCPMC8600550
OpenAlexW3212118462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.