ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2021
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Breast Cancer Patients: Clinicopathological Associations from a Single-Institution Study.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of peripheral T lymphocyte subsets and PD-1 expression as a biomarker for neoadjuvant treatment response in breast cancer.Medicine · 2025Article
- The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of the Expression of PD-L1 and MET Genes in Breast Cancer: Potential Therapeutic Targets.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTumor expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with evasion of immune response in several types of malignancies and such expression may render patients eligible for PD-L1 inhibitors. The use of immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been recently approved for the treatment of breast cancer. However, PD-L1 expression data are lacking among Jordanian breast cancer patients. In this study, the tumor PD-L1 expression was characterized in breast cancer patients to assess their eligibility for immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The study also aimed to explore the association between tumoral PD-L1 expression and the clinicopathologic characteristics and the prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsTissue samples were available from 153 female patients with primary invasive breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded tumor sections that were stained with a PD-L1 antibody. Expression of tumor PD-L1 was correlated with demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognosis.
resultsThe mean age at diagnosis was 54.2±12.8 years (median 52, interquartile range 45-65). The percentage of PD-L1-positive tumors was 26.1%. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells significantly and positively correlated with tumor size (rho=0.174, p=0.032). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the grade of carcinoma (p=0.001), HER2-positivity (p=0.015), and lymphovascular invasion (p=0.036). PD-L1 intensity was significantly associated with tumor stage (p=0.046). No significant associations were observed for the PD-L1 expression status or intensity with patient menopausal status, hormone receptor expression, and molecular subtypes. PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with a worse prognosis of breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis (rho=0.230, p=0.005).
conclusionTumor PD-L1 expression was associated with advanced clinicopathologic features and worse prognosis in this cohort of Jordanian breast cancer patients. Future studies are needed to better understand the impact of PD-L1 blockade therapy on treatment outcomes in eligible breast cancer patients in Jordan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.