ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2021
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Clinical Performance of Two Powder-Liquid Restoratives in Class-I/II Cavities.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Trial
- Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023Trial
- Effect of polymerization mode and LED light-curing units on the shear bond strength of an alkasite restorative material to dentin.Odontology · 2026Article
- An in vitro comparison of color stability between alkasite and different restorative materials in various staining solutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of Mechanical and Surface Properties of Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Alkasite Restorative Materials.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Can thermal cycling and iron supplement exposure alter the esthetic performance of bioactive dental materials?Odontology · 2026Article
- Performance of an alkasite restorative material under acidic conditions: surface roughness, gloss and hardness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Immediate and Delayed Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Alkasite and Giomer.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Surface roughness and biofilm formation on tooth-colored restorative materials immersed in food-simulating liquids.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Effects of Bioactive Composite Attachments for Clear Aligners.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the effects of different polishing systems on surface roughness and surface discoloration of various restorative materials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of bond durability of different self-adhesive bioactive restorative systems to dentin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Surface properties of direct restorations and adjacent dental tissues after saliva exposure.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Article
- An In Vitro Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength of Alkasite Restorative Material in Primary Molars Compared with Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Restorative Dental Resin Functionalized with Calcium Methacrylate with a Hydroxyapatite Remineralization Capacity.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fluoride and Calcium Release from Alkasite and Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Materials: In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
resultsFor shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite.
conclusionThe newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.