Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803298›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2021

Short term effects of rapid maxillary expansion on breathing function assessed with spirometry: A case-control study.

Andrea Abate, Davide Cavagnetto, Andrea Fama, Marco Matarese, Danilo Lucarelli, Fausto Assandri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea AbateDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Davide CavagnettoDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FamaDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco MatareseDepartment of Biomedical, Odontostomatological Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, School of Dentistry, Via Consolare Valeria 1, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Danilo LucarelliDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Fausto AssandriDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this work is to evaluate changes following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on breathing function in two groups of patients: mouth breathers and nasal breathers. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-five oral breather patients (12 male, 13 female, mean age 15.2 ± 1.3), and 25 nasal breather patients (14 male, 11 female, mean age 15.3 ± 1.6) were treated with RME. Breathing function was evaluated by computerized spirometry. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), Tiffenau index (FEV1/ FVC ratio, IT%), forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity (FEF 25-75%), and Tidal volume (TV) were assessed. Breathing function analysis was performed before RME and 6 and 12 months after RME during follow-up appointments. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess whether data were normally distributed. As data were not normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests were used to perform comparisons between treatment groups and within group comparisons, respectively.

resultsOral breathers and nasal breathers showed statistically significant differences in FVC, FEF 25-75%, and TV at T0. They did not present any statistically significant difference in FEV1 and IT% at the same time point.Statistically significant differences were noticed for all indices in the oral breather group after maxillary expansion, while the nasal breather group showed statistically significant differences only in FCV, FEF 25-75%, and TV after treatment.There were no statistically significant differences in all indices 12 months after maxillary expansion between the oral breather and nasal breather groups.

conclusionsRME appeared to improve breathing function in both groups. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity (FEF 25-75), and Tidal volume (TV) reached similar values in both groups after treatment with RME.

Indexed as

Breathing functionRapid maxillary expansionSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID34803298
PMCPMC8589571
OpenAlexW3084318366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.