Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803296›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2021

Age of the donor affects the nature of

Heba Alzer, Heba Kalbouneh, Firas Alsoleihat, Nisreen Abu Shahin, Soukaina Ryalat, Mohammad Alsalem, Hazem Alahmad, Lubna Tahtamouni

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heba AlzerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Heba KalbounehDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, School of Medicine, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Firas AlsoleihatDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Nisreen Abu ShahinDepartment of Histopathology, School of Medicine, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Soukaina RyalatDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Mohammad AlsalemDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, School of Medicine, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Hazem AlahmadDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, the University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Lubna TahtamouniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, The Hashemite University, 13133 Zarqa, Jordan.
University of Jordan · JOHashemite University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) of six donors (three young donors aged < 19 years and three adult donors aged > 25 and < 30 years) were characterized for their stem cell marker expression and differentiation potential to study the effect of donor age on DPSCs

methodsDPSCs were cultured in αMEM supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum (conventional conditions) or on fibronectin-coated flasks with neurobasal medium supplemented with B27, bFGF and EGF (alternative conditions). DPSCs were characterized by immunofluorescence staining to detect the neural crest/mesenchymal stem cells markers P75 and CD146, respectively. The differentiation potential was tested by the induction of DPSCs into osteogenic, adipogenic and glial lineages and then by detecting the corresponding markers osteocalcin, lipidtox and S100ß, respectively.

resultsThe DPSCs of the young donors expressed CD146 only under the conventional conditions and expressed P75 regardless of the culture conditions. However, the DPSCs of adult donors expressed CD146 only under the alternative conditions and expressed P75 only under conventional conditions. Only the DPSCs of the young donors differentiated into the glial linage. The DPSCs of the adult donors differentiated more efficiently into the adipogenic linage. Osteogenic differentiation was comparable.

conclusionDonor age affects the expression of stem cell markers and differentiation potential of DPSCs. Moreover, the effect of culture conditions on DPSCs is age dependent.

Indexed as

Culture conditionsDental pulp stem cellsDonor age effectMesenchymal stem cellsNeural crest stem cells

Identifiers

PMID34803296
PMCPMC8589584
OpenAlexW3089315133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.