ArticleSafety science2022
A coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics and Wells-Riley model to predict COVID-19 infection probability for passengers on long-distance trains.
Article in Safety science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk assessment of infection of COVID-19 contacts based on scenario simulation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Interventional Study of Nonpharmaceutical Measures to Prevent COVID-19 Aboard Cruise Ships.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- COVID-19 transmission and control in land public transport: A literature review.Fundamental research · 2024Review
- Numerical performance of COScientific reports · 2024Article
- Generalizing the Wells-Riley Infection Probability: A Superstatistical Scheme for Indoor Infection Risk Estimation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Experimental study on the control effects of different strategies on particle transportation in a conference room: Mechanical ventilation, baffle, portable air cleaner, and desk air cleaner.Atmospheric pollution research · 2023Article
- Prediction of COVID-19 Infection in Dental Clinic by CFD and Wells-Riley Model, Identifying Safe Area and Proper Ventilation Velocity: Prédiction de l'infection au COVID-19 dans une clinique dentaire par CFD et modèle Wells-Riley, identification de la zone de sécurité et de la vitesse de ventilation appropriée.Revue internationale du froid · 2023Article
- Optimization of cabin seating arrangement strategies based on the Wells-Riley risk theory.PloS one · 2023Article
- Energy, economic, and environmental impacts of enhanced ventilation strategies on railway coaches to reduce Covid-19 contagion risks.Energy (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- A systematic review of COVID-19 transport policies and mitigation strategies around the globe.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2022Article
- Influence of indoor airflow on particle spread of a single breath and cough in enclosures: Does opening a window really 'help'?Atmospheric pollution research · 2022Article
- Ventilation strategies and design impacts on indoor airborne transmission: A review.Building and environment · 2022Review
- Modeling the effects of vaccination, nucleic acid testing, and face mask wearing interventions against COVID-19 in large sports events.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coupled Wells-Riley (WR) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling (WR-CFD) facilitates a detailed analysis of COVID-19 infection probability (IP). This approach overcomes issues associated with the WR 'well-mixed' assumption. The WR-CFD model, which makes uses of a scalar approach to simulate quanta dispersal, is applied to Chinese long-distance trains (G-train). Predicted IPs, at multiple locations, are validated using statistically derived (SD) IPs from reported infections on G-trains. This is the first known attempt to validate a coupled WR-CFD approach using reported COVID-19 infections derived from the rail environment. There is reasonable agreement between trends in predicted and SD IPs, with the maximum SD IP being 10.3% while maximum predicted IP was 14.8%. Additionally, predicted locations of highest and lowest IP, agree with those identified in the statistical analysis. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the distribution of infectious aerosols is non-uniform and dependent on the nature of the ventilation. This suggests that modelling techniques neglecting these differences are inappropriate for assessing mitigation measures such as physical distancing. A range of mitigation strategies were analysed; the most effective being the majority (90%) of passengers correctly wearing high efficiency masks (e.g. N95). Compared to the base case (40% of passengers wearing low efficiency masks) there was a 95% reduction in average IP. Surprisingly, HEPA filtration was only effective for passengers distant from an index patient, having almost no effect for those in close proximity. Finally, as the approach is based on CFD it can be applied to a range of other indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.