Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34803023›Full record

Trial reportGut2022

Influence of timing of maternal antibiotic administration during caesarean section on infant microbial colonisation: a randomised controlled trial.

Thomas Dierikx, Daniel Berkhout, Anat Eck, Sebastian Tims, Johan van Limbergen, Douwe Visser, Marjon de Boer, Nanne de Boer, Daan Touw, Marc Benninga and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas DierikxDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands t.dierikx@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0790-0987
Daniel BerkhoutDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anat EckNutricia Research Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sebastian TimsNutricia Research Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johan van LimbergenDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-4371
Douwe VisserDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjon de BoerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne de BoerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daan TouwDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, University of Groningen Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marc BenningaDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nine SchierbeekDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura VisserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan KnolNutricia Research Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guus RoeselersNutricia Research Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanna de VriesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim de MeijDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLNutricia Research (Netherlands) · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLDalhousie University · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRevised guidelines for caesarean section (CS) advise maternal antibiotic administration prior to skin incision instead of after umbilical cord clamping, unintentionally exposing the infant to antibiotics antenatally. We aimed to investigate if timing of intrapartum antibiotics contributes to the impairment of microbiota colonisation in CS born infants.

designIn this randomised controlled trial, women delivering via CS received antibiotics prior to skin incision (n=20) or after umbilical cord clamping (n=20). A third control group of vaginally delivering women (n=23) was included. Faecal microbiota was determined from all infants at 1, 7 and 28 days after birth and at 3 years by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing.

resultsCompared with vaginally born infants, profound differences were found in microbial diversity and composition in both CS groups in the first month of life. A decreased abundance in species belonging to the genera

conclusionWe confirmed that microbiome colonisation is strongly affected by CS delivery. Our findings suggest that maternal antibiotic administration prior to CS does not result in a second hit on the compromised microbiome. Future, larger studies should confirm that antenatal antibiotic exposure in CS born infants does not aggravate colonisation impairment and impact long-term health.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCesarean SectionBacteroidesBifidobacteriumFecesFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibioticsinfant gutintestinal microbiologypaediatric gastroenterology

Identifiers

PMID34803023
PMCPMC9380480
OpenAlexW3216809542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.