Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34802968›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

The role of vein grafts in reconstructive head and neck microsurgery.

Chih-Sheng Lai, Yi-Ting Chang, Ching-Hui Shen, Yueh-Chi Tsai, Chen-Te Lu, Jung-Hsing Yen, I-Chen Chen, Yi-Ling Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chih-Sheng LaiNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yi-Ting ChangTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ching-Hui ShenTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yueh-Chi TsaiNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; HungKuang University, Department of Nursing, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chen-Te LuNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Jung-Hsing YenNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
I-Chen ChenNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yi-Ling LinNational Chung Hsing University, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; HungKuang University, Department of Nursing, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Emergency, Division of Trauma and Critical Care Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China. Electronic address: lovesmart@vghtc.gov.tw.
National Chung Hsing University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFree tissue transfer is widely used for head and neck reconstruction. In certain circumstances, vein grafting is required to elongate free flap pedicles to connect them to appropriate recipient vessels. Because of controversy regarding the use of interposition vein grafts in free tissue reconstruction, this paper reports vein graft indications, techniques, safety, and outcomes for head and neck microvascular surgery.

methodsTwenty-six patients (23 men and 3 women) who underwent interposition vein grafting concurrent with free tissue transfer were included in this study. The most common reason for head and neck reconstruction with vein graft was tumor recurrence, followed by flap salvage. The interposition vein grafts were applied in two manners as temporary arteriovenous (A-V) loop and conduit to extend the length of the free flap for venous drainage.

resultsThe most common reconstructions were anterolateral thigh flaps (15 cases), followed by vastus lateralis myocutaneous (3 cases) and radial forearm (2 cases) flaps. The common recipient vessels were superior thyroid artery, superficial temporal artery and external jugular vein. The free flap loss rate was 7.7% with vein grafts and 4.9 without vein grafts (p = 0.380). The free flap complication rate was 50.0% and 16.8% in patients with and without vein grafts, respectively (p < 0.001). Radiation therapy, chemotherapy, prior neck dissection, and prior free flap transfer were more common in the vein graft group (all p < 0.001). The hospital stay was significantly longer for the vein graft group than for the non-vein graft group (29.5 vs. 19.0 days; p = 0.001).

conclusionOverall free flap survival rates of 92.3% and 95.1% in the vein and non-vein graft groups, respectively - indicating the reliability of the vein grafts in challenging head and neck reconstructions, particularly in salvage cases and patients with multiple reconstructions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsHead and Neck NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMicrosurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArteriovenous loopA–V loopInterposition vein graft

Identifiers

PMID34802968
PMCPMC9756049
OpenAlexW3209187719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.