Trial reportJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?
Trial report in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUninsured patients are susceptible to being lost to follow-up (LTFU). In addition to being uninsured, follow-up is especially critical among this population during transitions of care when patients are discharged from the hospital setting back to home because follow-up care after discharge has been proven to prevent readmissions. The LACE tool has historically been used to predict readmissions, but the LACE tool has not been used to evaluate patients' risk of LTFU.
objectiveTo understand the potential translation of the LACE tool for use in uninsured patients' follow-up care, we assessed the association between LACE index scores and patients' risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program for uninsured patients.
methodsData were extracted from a randomized controlled trial implementing a pharmacist-led transitions of care program at an indigent care clinic. The study population included uninsured adult patients (>18 years old) who spoke English and attended a clinical visit with a pharmacist within 16 days after discharge from a community hospital. Analyses sought to determine factors associated with the patients' LTFU status.
resultsAmong 88 enrolled participants, 29 participants (32.95%) were LTFU. Thirty-two patients (36.4%) had a high LACE index score at baseline, indicating an increased risk of 30-day readmission. Of the remaining 56 patients (63.6%) with low-to-moderate LACE index scores, 54 (61.4%) had a moderate LACE index score, and only 2 (2.3%) had a low LACE index score. Uninsured patients with high LACE index scores had 70% lower odds of being LTFU than uninsured patients with low-to-moderate LACE index scores (exact odds ratio 0.297 [95% CI 0.081-0.947]).
conclusionThe LACE index score was inversely related to the risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program. Pharmacists may use the LACE tool to identify patients at high risk of LTFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.