Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34802799›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2021

[Primary care organization in pandemic times].

Txema Coll Benejam, Jesús Palacio Lapuente, Rosa Añel Rodríguez, Montse Gens Barbera, Juan José Jurado Balbuena, Aina Perelló Bratescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FMC : Formacion medica continuada en atencion primaria · 2022
    Article
  7. Longitudinalidad tras la pandemia.Atencion primaria · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Txema Coll BenejamMédico de familia, Director de Atención Primaria, Área de Salut de Menorca, Ibsalut, Menorca, España; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC).
Jesús Palacio LapuenteMédico de familia, Zaragoza, España, WONCA World Working Party on Quality and Safety on Family Medicine; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC).
Rosa Añel RodríguezMédica de familia, Centro de Salud Landako, Durango, Osakidetza/Servicio Vasco de Salud, País Vasco, España; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC). Electronic address: rosamarianel@gmail.com.
Montse Gens BarberaMédica de familia, Unidad de Calidad y Seguridad del Paciente, Gerencia Territorial Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, España; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC).
Juan José Jurado BalbuenaEnfermero CS Alicante, Fuenlabrada, Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS), Madrid, España; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC).
Aina Perelló BratescuMédica de familia, CAP Larrard, Atenció Primària Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, España, Grupo Atdom Camfic; Grupo de Seguridad del Paciente de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the adoption of drastic changes in primary care, modifying the organization and work dynamics previously established. From one day to the next, professionals had to adapt to the new situation to be able to attend cases and contacts tracing, to avoid contagion and to maintain attention to other health problems. At the beginning of the pandemic, professionals had to establish new practices and care circuits in primary care in an improvised way, due to lack of updated guidelines, without adequate means of protection, evaluating their risks and benefits on the fly. We present the main organizational changes in the first level of care and describe, from the point of view of patient safety and the consequences for patients and professionals of the priority care for COVID-19. Finally, we consider how to incorporate the knowledge acquired during the pandemic, analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the adopted measures to maintain as much as possible a safe, accessible and quality primary care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Atención primariaCOVID-19EfficiencyEficienciaOccupational healthOrganización y administraciónOrganization and administrationPatient safetyPrimary careSalud de los profesionalesSeguridad del paciente

Identifiers

PMID34802799
PMCPMC8603466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.