Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34802111›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2022

Evaluation of OIDx Histoplasma Urinary Antigen EIA.

Diego H Cáceres, Beatriz L Gómez, Ángela M Tobón, Tom M Chiller, Mark D Lindsley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Usefulness of Serum as a Non-Invasive Sample for the Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunologic Diagnosis of Endemic Mycoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Cryptococcal andOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Diego H CáceresCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. diegocaceres84@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-9809
Beatriz L GómezStudies in Translational Microbiology and Emerging Diseases (MICROS) Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
Ángela M TobónHospital La Maria, Medellín, Colombia.
Tom M ChillerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.
Mark D LindsleyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInstituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical · COUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Histoplasma antigens (Ag) in urine, developed by Optimum Imaging Diagnostics (OIDx) was evaluated. A verification using a standardized reference panel of urine samples found sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 32% and accuracy of 51%. In this study, the OIDx Histoplasma urinary Ag EIA displayed high sensitivity, however, in non-histoplasmosis cases this EIA displayed false-positive results in 68% of specimens tested.

Indexed as

HistoplasmaHistoplasmosisAntigens, FungalHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, FungalAntigenEnzyme immunoassayHistoplasmaHistoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID34802111
OpenAlexW3198819895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.