ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2021
Patient-reported outcomes: Is this the missing link in patient-centered perioperative care?
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative pain after dental procedures: The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network observational study using a mobile health platform.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2026Observational
- From Knowledge Graphs to Digital Twins: Perspectives on Modeling Patient Outcomes for Health Care Quality Assessment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Digital health interventions for perioperative patient-reported outcomes: a network meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing the User Experience of a Perioperative Digital Health Tool for Information Exchange Using a Human-Centered Design Thinking Approach: Qualitative Observational Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Observational
- Integrating a Multimodal Digital Device for Continuous Perioperative Monitoring in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: Development and Usability Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Patient-reported walking difficulty predicting the post-discharge overall function in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Interventions influencing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) response rates in cancer: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Review
- An Assessment of ChatGPT's Responses to Common Patient Questions About Lung Cancer Surgery: A Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Accuracy and Relevance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Use of opioids and opioid alternatives during general anesthesia: a pan-Canadian survey among anesthesiologists.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Article
- Clinical relevance of current patient-reported outcome measures for ankle fracture: surgeons' perspective.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024Article
- Reporting patient experiences within elective perioperative care: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024Article
- Towards the Improvement of Patient Experience Evaluation Items for Patient-Centered Care in Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Comparative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intraoperative pharmacologic opioid minimisation strategies and patient-centred outcomes after surgery: a scoping review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Patient-reported symptoms at discharge and risk of complications after gynecologic surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been increasingly recognized as valuable information for delivery of optimal perioperative care to high-risk surgical patients in recent years. However, progress from clinical research on PROs has not been widely adopted in routine patient care. This review discusses the current concepts and practice status regarding PROs and addresses the missing links from research to practice adoption to further improve patient's experiences and clinical outcomes in perioperative care. Insufficient empirical research on appropriate PROs and its methodologies, insufficient implementation research to solve the practical issues, and insufficient data collection methods and experiences on ePROs are also discussed. Future research agenda should focus on evidence-supported, PRO-based symptom monitoring systems for early diagnosis and management of impending compromised clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.