Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34801090›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

"PPI? That sounds like Payment Protection Insurance": Reflections and learning from a substance use and homelessness study Experts by Experience group.

Rebecca Foster, Hannah Carver, Jason Wallace, Alex Dunedin, Stan Burridge, Philip Foley, Bernie Pauly, Tessa Parkes

Erratum issuedAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. How Do Participatory Citizenship Models Inform Co-production in Health Research? A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Commissioning and co-production in health and care services in the United Kingdom and Ireland: An exploratory literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  9. Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca FosterSalvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, 4S26 RG Bomont Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Hannah CarverSalvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, 4S26 RG Bomont Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. Hannah.Carver@stir.ac.uk.
Jason WallaceThe Scottish Drugs Forum, 91 Mitchell Street, Glasgow, UK.
Alex DunedinThe Ragged University, Online Forum, Edinburgh, UK.
Stan BurridgeExpert Focus, Basildon, Essex, UK.
Philip FoleyTurning Point Scotland, 54 Govan Road, Glasgow, UK.
Bernie PaulySchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Tessa ParkesSalvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, 4S26 RG Bomont Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Funding

national institute for health research HTA 16/153/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and Public Involvement in research is important for citizenship, accountability and transparency, and has the practical benefit of helping to ensure its quality and applicability. Involving members of the public in research is becoming increasingly commonplace, in the UK and internationally. It is essential that public involvement is inclusive of individuals and their diverse life experiences, including challenging experiences that may be associated with stigma and social exclusion. The involvement of people with lived/living experience of substance use and homelessness in research is increasing in response to increased recognition of the importance of inclusion and the benefits conferred to research. MAIN BODY: In this commentary, we share our own experiences of being part of a Patient and Public Involvement group that was convened during a feasibility study of a peer-delivered harm reduction intervention. We are a diverse group but share experience of the field of substance use/homelessness, as people with lived/living experience, and as researchers and practitioners. We share our reflections and learning, as well as offer recommendations for researchers working in our field. Our group worked together to make a positive and deliberate contribution to the study. This did not happen by chance but required the development of mutual trust and respect, with each member having a commitment to support the group for its two-year duration. SHORT

conclusionIt is important for researchers to appreciate that meaningful Patient and Public Involvement is very valuable but requires a commitment from all involved. Regarding our field of substance use and homelessness specifically, it is essential that people with these experiences have opportunities to contribute to research and can do so in a meaningful way. People with lived/living experience are able to bring to life the rich tapestry of others' experiences. However, the involvement must be neither tokenistic nor indifferent to the wider challenges common to these experiences.

Indexed as

HomelessnessLived experiencePatient and public involvementSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34801090
PMCPMC8605889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.