Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34801063›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Intravaginal electrical stimulation associated with pelvic floor muscle training for women with stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation.

Bianca Manzan Reis, Jordana Barbosa da Silva, Ana Paula Rodrigues Rocha, Richard Eloin Liebano, Patricia Driusso

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perspectives on the Therapeutic Effects of Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bianca Manzan ReisWomen's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luis, km 235, CEP, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Jordana Barbosa da SilvaWomen's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luis, km 235, CEP, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Ana Paula Rodrigues RochaWomen's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luis, km 235, CEP, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Richard Eloin LiebanoPhysioterapeutics Resources Laboratory, Physical Therapy Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Patricia DriussoWomen's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luis, km 235, CEP, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil. pdriusso@ufscar.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8067-9786
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior financing code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo process number 2018 / 26718-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are described as conservative interventions to prevent or treat female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, it has not been described yet the effect of PFMT associated to intravaginal NMES which evaluated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of treating.

aimsTo evaluate the effects of intravaginal NMES associated with the PFMT protocol on urinary loss and quality of life in women with SUI and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility and pelvic floor muscle in women with SUI.

methodsRandomized controlled trial study with economic evaluation. Inclusion criteria are woman (biological), aged ≥ 18 years old and with a report of SUI ≥ once/week. Exclusion criteria are presence of vaginal or urinary infection, virginity, being in the gestational or puerperium period, or neurological disease. Participants will undergo physical therapy assessment and intervention: anamnesis, pelvic floor muscle assessment by vaginal palpation and manometry (Peritron DISCUSSION: This protocol can corroborate with the literature in order to identify the effect of techniques, based on the possibility of confirming the hypothesis that the NMES associated with PFMT performed concurrently will be the best treatment option; considering the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analysis, it will be used as an option for optimization of the treatment of SUI.

trial registrationBrazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) ID: RBR-6gtzg4 . Registered on September 3, 2019.

Indexed as

Urinary Incontinence, StressAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisElectric StimulationExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPelvic FloorQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeClinical protocolsCosts and cost analysisPelvic floorPhysical therapy specialtyUrinary incontinenceWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID34801063
PMCPMC8606065
OpenAlexW3215886601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.