Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34801001›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Health priority-setting for official development assistance in low-income and middle-income countries: a Best Fit Framework Synthesis study with primary data from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Tanzania.

Xiaoxiao Jiang Kwete, Yemane Berhane, Mary Mwanyika-Sando, Ayo Oduola, Yuning Liu, Firehiwot Workneh, Smret Hagos, Japhet Killewo, Dominic Mosha, Angela Chukwu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xiaoxiao Jiang KweteHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02150, USA. xiaoxiao@mail.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-1068
Yemane BerhaneAddis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mary Mwanyika-SandoAfrica Academy for Public Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ayo OduolaUniversity of Ibadan Research Foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Yuning LiuJPMorgan Chase Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Firehiwot WorknehAddis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Smret HagosAddis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Japhet KillewoMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Dominic MoshaAfrica Academy for Public Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Angela ChukwuUniversity of Ibadan Research Foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Kabiru SalamiUniversity of Ibadan Research Foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Bidemi YusufUniversity of Ibadan Research Foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Kun TangTsinghua University Vanke School of Public Health, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Jie ZhengPeking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.
Rifat Atun *Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02150, USA.
Wafaie Fawzi *Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02150, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecision making process for Official Development Assistance (ODA) for healthcare sector in low-income and middle-income countries involves multiple agencies, each with their unique power, priorities and funding mechanisms. This process at country level has not been well studied.

methodsThis paper developed and applied a new framework to analyze decision-making process for priority setting in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Tanzania, and collected primary data to validate and refine the model. The framework was developed following a scoping review of published literature. Interviews were then conducted using a pre-determined interview guide developed by the research team. Transcripts were reviewed and coded based on the framework to identify what principles, players, processes, and products were considered during priority setting. Those elements were further used to identify where the potential capacity of local decision-makers could be harnessed.

resultsA framework was developed based on 40 articles selected from 6860 distinct search records. Twenty-one interviews were conducted in three case countries from 12 institutions. Transcripts or meeting notes were analyzed to identify common practices and specific challenges faced by each country. We found that multiple stakeholders working around one national plan was the preferred approach used for priority setting in the countries studied.

conclusionsPriority setting process can be further strengthened through better use of analytical tools, such as the one described in our study, to enhance local ownership of priority setting for ODA and improve aid effectiveness.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PrioritiesEthiopiaHumansNigeriaTanzaniaHealth systemsOfficial development assistancePriority settingQualitative case study

Identifiers

PMID34801001
PMCPMC8605935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.