Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800971›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Comparative analysis of transposable elements provides insights into genome evolution in the genus Camelus.

Mohanad A Ibrahim, Badr M Al-Shomrani, Mathew Simenc, Sultan N Alharbi, Fahad H Alqahtani, Mohamed B Al-Fageeh, Manee M Manee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First Genome Assembly of the Critically Endangered Arabian Leopard (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Mitochondrial DNA of the Arabian CamelAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. LTR Retroelements and Bird Adaptation to Arid Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohanad A IbrahimNational Center for Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Badr M Al-ShomraniNational Center for Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mathew SimencDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, USA.
Sultan N AlharbiNational Center for Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad H AlqahtaniNational Center for Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed B Al-FageehLife Sciences and Environment Research Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manee M ManeeNational Center for Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. malmanee@kacst.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-619X
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SACalifornia State University, Fullerton · US

Funding

King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 20-0078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransposable elements (TEs) are common features in eukaryotic genomes that are known to affect genome evolution critically and to play roles in gene regulation. Vertebrate genomes are dominated by TEs, which can reach copy numbers in the hundreds of thousands. To date, details regarding the presence and characteristics of TEs in camelid genomes have not been made available.

resultsWe conducted a genome-wide comparative analysis of camelid TEs, focusing on the identification of TEs and elucidation of transposition histories in four species: Camelus dromedarius, C. bactrianus, C. ferus, and Vicugna pacos. Our TE library was created using both de novo structure-based and homology-based searching strategies ( https://github.com/kacst-bioinfo-lab/TE_ideintification_pipeline ). Annotation results indicated a similar proportion of each genomes comprising TEs (35-36%). Class I LTR retrotransposons comprised 16-20% of genomes, and mostly consisted of the endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) groups ERVL, ERVL-MaLR, ERV_classI, and ERV_classII. Non-LTR elements comprised about 12% of genomes and consisted of SINEs (MIRs) and the LINE superfamilies LINE1, LINE2, L3/CR1, and RTE clades. Least represented were the Class II DNA transposons (2%), consisting of hAT-Charlie, TcMar-Tigger, and Helitron elements and comprising about 1-2% of each genome.

conclusionsThe findings of the present study revealed that the distribution of transposable elements across camelid genomes is approximately similar. This investigation presents a characterization of TE content in four camelid to contribute to developing a better understanding of camelid genome architecture and evolution.

Indexed as

CamelusDNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsEvolution, MolecularRetroelementsShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelementsCamelid genomesDe novo TEs annotationRetrotransposonsTransposable elementsTransposons

Identifiers

PMID34800971
PMCPMC8605555
OpenAlexW3214928875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.