Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800913›Full record

ArticleEating behaviors2021

The ironic effects of dietary restraint in situations that undermine self-regulation.

Charlotte J Hagerman, Michelle L Stock, Janine B Beekman, Ellen W Yeung, Susan Persky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating behaviors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Food-Related Attentional Biases in Restrained Eaters: A Meta-Analysis.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte J HagermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA; Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL) Center, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: cjh427@drexel.edu.
Michelle L StockDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Janine B BeekmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Ellen W YeungDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Susan PerskySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Building 31, Room B1B36, 31 Center Dr., MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
George Washington University · USDrexel University · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

Eating and Feeding Behavior: Exploring Phenotypes and Influencing OutcomesZIAHG200396 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PERSKY, SUSAN · 2015 to 2025
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary restraint, defined as the cognitive effort to restrict eating, can paradoxically make individuals more susceptible to unhealthy eating when their ability to self-regulate is threatened. Past experiments have found that, in situations that elicit low self-control and/or unhealthy cravings, participants with higher dietary restraint eat more than those with lower restraint. However, these relationships have never been examined in a free-living environment. The current daily diary study examined if dietary restraint would exacerbate the associations between poor self-control and unhealthy cravings with overconsumption, namely, eating more than usual and binge eating. College women (N = 121, M age = 19) reported their restrained eating behavior and completed seven daily surveys. Multilevel analyses showed a significant interaction between dietary restraint and daily self-control on eating more than usual (b = -0.13, p = .001) and binge eating (b = -0.22, p < .001). Lower daily self-control was associated with eating more than usual and with more binge eating that day, but only among women with higher dietary restraint. Dietary restraint also moderated the effect of cravings on eating more than usual (b = 0.10, p = .007); this relationship was stronger for women with higher restraint. Stronger cravings were associated with more binge eating regardless of restraint. Results suggest that situations that undermine self-control are more strongly associated with overeating among those with higher dietary restraint. Findings can inform strategies to reduce overconsumption among restrained eaters.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaSelf-ControlAdultDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDietary restraintFood cravingsIronic process theoryOvereatingSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID34800913
PMCPMC10124920
OpenAlexW3214652588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.