Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800623›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2022

Immunofluorescence Assay of Ablated Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Frozen Section of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation?

Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos, Efsevia Vakiani, Sho Fujisawa, Mithat Gonen, Ning Fan, Yevgeniy Romin, Richard K G Do, Etay Ziv, Joseph P Erinjeri, Elena N Petre and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. 3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikiforos Vasiniotis KamarinosInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Efsevia VakianiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sho FujisawaDepartment of Molecular Cytology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Statistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ning FanDepartment of Molecular Cytology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yevgeniy RominDepartment of Molecular Cytology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Richard K G DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Etay ZivInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joseph P ErinjeriInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Elena N PetreInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Vlasios S SotirchosInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Juan C CamachoInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stephen B SolomonInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Katia Manova-TodorovaDepartment of Molecular Cytology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Constantinos T SofocleousInterventional Oncology, IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: sofoclec@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Optimizing Thermal Ablation for Colon Cancer Liver Metastases: Rapid Tissue Analysis Allowing for Immediate Retreatment; Metabolic Imaging Biomarker Validation; and Predictive Genetic SignaturesR01CA240569 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SOFOCLEOUS, CONSTANTINOS THASOS · 2019 to 2022
$840k
Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features of Tissue Adherent to the ElectrR21CA131763 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SOFOCLEOUS, CONSTANTINOS THASOS · 2009 to 2011
$453k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240569NCI NIH HHS R21 CA131763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) detecting residual viable tumor (VT) as intraprocedural thermal ablation (TA) zone assessment and demonstrate its prognostic value for local tumor progression (LTP) after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) TA. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study, approved by the institutional review board, included 99 patients with 155 CLMs ablated between November 2009 and January 2019. Tissue samples from the ablation zone (AZ) center and minimal margin underwent immunofluorescent microscopic examination interrogating cellular morphology and mitochondrial viability (IFA) within 30 minutes after ablation. The same tissue samples were subsequently evaluated with standard morphologic and immunohistochemical methods. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IFA versus standard morphologic and immunohistochemical examination were calculated. The LTP-free survival rates were evaluated for the 12-month follow-up period.

resultsOf the 311 tissue samples stained, 304 (98%) were deemed evaluable. Of these specimens, 27% (81/304) were considered positive for the presence of VT. The accuracy of IFA was 94% (286/304). The sensitivity and specificity were 100% (63/63) and 93% (223/241), respectively. The 18 false-positive IFA assessments corresponded to samples that included viable cholangiocytes. The 12-month LTP-free survival was 59% versus 78% for IFA positive versus negative for VT AZs, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in LTP between margin positive only and central AZ-positive tumors (25% vs 31%, P = 1).

conclusionsThe IFA assessment of the AZ can be completed intraprocedurally and serve as a valid real-time biomarker of complete tumor eradication or detect residual VT after TA. This method could improve tumor control by TA.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationColorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFluorescent Antibody TechniqueFrozen SectionsHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34800623
PMCPMC9531411
OpenAlexW3214645601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.