Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800468›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmacology2021

Lack of evidence for positive reinforcing and prosocial effects of MDMA in pair-housed male and female rats.

Mark A Smith, Karl T Schmidt, Jessica L Sharp, Tallia Pearson, Anna L Davis, Abigail N Gibson, Kenzie M Potter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Protective Effect of Social Reward on Opioid and Psychostimulant Reward and Relapse: Behavior, Pharmacology, and Brain Regions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark A SmithDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu.
Karl T SchmidtDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.
Jessica L SharpDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.
Tallia PearsonDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.
Anna L DavisDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.
Abigail N GibsonDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.
Kenzie M PotterDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.

Funding

Social Influences on Drug-Seeking BehaviorR01DA031725 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2012 to 2022
$3.1M
The Influence of Gonadal Hormones on Opioid UseR01DA045364 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
Social Contact and MDMA UseR03DA045714 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2018 to 2019
$136k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031725NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045364NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA045714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is classified as an entactogen, producing feelings of emotional openness and relatedness. One unique feature of MDMA is that people tend to selectively take this drug in social and/or intimate situations. Although MDMA is recognized as having abuse liability, preclinical studies report that it has weak reinforcing effects in animals. The objective of this study was to characterize the positive reinforcing and prosocial effects of MDMA in a translational model of the social environment in which two rats have simultaneous and contingent access to MDMA in close physical proximity. To this end, MDMA self-administration was examined on both fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement in six groups of rats: (1) isolated males, (2) isolated females, (3) male-male dyads, (4) female-female dyads, (5) male-female dyads, and (6) female-male dyads. For pair-housed rats, data from both rats were analyzed. Next, social preferences were examined in a partner preference test. MDMA failed to produce positive reinforcing effects under all conditions examined. Across a 30-fold dose range (0.01-1.0 mg/kg/infusion), MDMA did not maintain higher responding than saline on both schedules of reinforcement and in all groups tested. In partner preference tests, a history of shared exposure to MDMA did not establish a social preference, and acute administration of MDMA failed to establish a preference for another MDMA-treated rat. These data suggest that social contact does not increase the positive reinforcing effects of MDMA in rats, and that neither contingent nor noncontingent MDMA administration establishes a social preference in rats.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, AnimalN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineRatsSelf AdministrationSocial InteractionN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineEcstasyMollyPartner preferenceSelf-administrationSocial behaviorSocial choice

Identifiers

PMID34800468
PMCPMC8675402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.