SynthesisThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022
Tuberculosis screening among ambulatory people living with HIV: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parallel use of low-complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assays to detect tuberculosis disease in adults and adolescents living with HIV.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Parallel use of low-complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assays to detect tuberculosis disease in adults and adolescents living with HIV.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Subclinical tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of prevalence and scoping review of definitions, prevalence and clinical characteristics.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- What do the clinical features of positive nontuberculous mycobacteria isolates from patients with HIV/AIDS in China reveal? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical utility of WHO-recommended screening tools and development and validation of novel clinical prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis screening among outpatients living with HIV: an individual participant data meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of WHO screening criteria to guide lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan testing among HIV-positive inpatients: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.The Journal of infection · 2022Pooled it
- Tuberculosis screening among HIV-positive inpatients: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.The lancet. HIV · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein and Computer-Aided Analysis of Chest X-rays as Tuberculosis Triage Tests at Health Facilities in Lesotho and South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Trial
- Timing of maternal isoniazid preventive therapy on tuberculosis infection among infants exposed to HIV in low-income and middle-income settings: a secondary analysis of the TB APPRISE trial.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2023Trial
- Predictive Value of C-reactive Protein for Hospitalization and Mortality Among People With Advanced HIV Disease in Uganda Receiving the World Health Organization-recommended Package of Care.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsies: feasible and safe use of pathology services in a resource-limited, high TB/HIV prevalence setting.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Computer-Aided Analysis of Photographed Chest X-Ray Films Performs Well Compared With Trained Radiologists.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Feasibility, challenges, and solutions for implementing targeted universal tuberculosis testing: perceptions of healthcare professionals in South Africa.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- C-Reactive Protein for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Screening and Treatment Response Monitoring in Children.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Determinants of drop-offs in the targeted universal tuberculosis testing care cascade among people with HIV in rural and urban facilities in South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular insights into the functional mechanism of phosphoserine phosphatase SerB2 inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterization of the Targeted Universal Tuberculosis Testing Care Cascade Among People With HIV in PEPFAR-Supported Districts in South Africa.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Screening and diagnostic strategies for active pulmonary tuberculosis among people in prison in Malaysia: a prospective diagnostic study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Frequency of tuberculosis symptoms at repeat visits amongst adults attending for HIV care in Gauteng province, South Africa.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
54 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO-recommended tuberculosis screening and diagnostic algorithm in ambulatory people living with HIV is a four-symptom screen (known as the WHO-recommended four symptom screen [W4SS]) followed by a WHO-recommended molecular rapid diagnostic test (eg Xpert MTB/RIF [hereafter referred to as Xpert]) if W4SS is positive. To inform updated WHO guidelines, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of alternative screening tests and strategies for tuberculosis in this population.
methodsIn this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we updated a search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and conference abstracts for publications from Jan 1, 2011, to March 12, 2018, done in a previous systematic review to include the period up to Aug 2, 2019. We screened the reference lists of identified pieces and contacted experts in the field. We included prospective cross-sectional, observational studies and randomised trials among adult and adolescent (age ≥10 years) ambulatory people living with HIV, irrespective of signs and symptoms of tuberculosis. We extracted study-level data using a standardised data extraction form, and we requested individual participant data from study authors. We aimed to compare the W4SS with alternative screening tests and strategies and the WHO-recommended algorithm (ie, W4SS followed by Xpert) with Xpert for all in terms of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), overall and in key subgroups (eg, by antiretroviral therapy [ART] status). The reference standard was culture. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020155895.
findingsWe identified 25 studies, and obtained data from 22 studies (including 15 666 participants; 4347 [27·7%] of 15 663 participants with data were on ART). W4SS sensitivity was 82% (95% CI 72-89) and specificity was 42% (29-57). C-reactive protein (≥10 mg/L) had similar sensitivity to (77% [61-88]), but higher specificity (74% [61-83]; n=3571) than, W4SS. Cough (lasting ≥2 weeks), haemoglobin (<10 g/dL), body-mass index (<18·5 kg/m
interpretationC-reactive protein reduces the need for further rapid diagnostic tests without compromising sensitivity and has been included in the updated WHO tuberculosis screening guidelines. However, C-reactive protein data were scarce for outpatients on ART, necessitating future research regarding the utility of C-reactive protein in this group. Chest x-ray can be useful in outpatients on ART when combined with W4SS. The WHO-recommended algorithm has suboptimal sensitivity; Xpert for all offers slight sensitivity gains and would have major resource implications.
fundingWorld Health Organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.