ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2022
High-frequency stimulation induces axonal conduction block without generating initial action potentials.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal properties of direct current sensory block of the rat sciatic nerve using the C-fiber reflex.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Pudendal Nerve Block by Adaptively Stepwise Increasing the Intensity of High-Frequency (10 kHz) Biphasic Stimulation.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025Article
- High frequency alternating current neurostimulation decreases nocifensive behavior in a disc herniation model of lumbar radiculopathy.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Article
- Intracellular sodium concentration and membrane potential oscillation in axonal conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this modeling study is to develop a novel method to block nerve conduction by high frequency biphasic stimulation (HFBS) without generating initial action potentials. An axonal conduction model including both ion concentrations and membrane ion pumps is used to analyze the axonal response to 1 kHz HFBS. The intensity of HFBS is increased in multiple steps while maintaining the intensity at a sub-threshold level to avoid generating an action potential. Axonal conduction block by HFBS is defined as the failure of action potential propagation at the site of HFBS. The simulation analysis shows that step-increases in sub-threshold intensity during HFBS can successfully block axonal conduction without generating an initial response because the excitation threshold of the axon can be gradually increased by the sub-threshold HFBS. The mechanisms underlying the increase in excitation threshold involve changes in intracellular and extracellular sodium and potassium concentration, change in the resting potential, partial inactivation of the sodium channel and partial activation of the potassium channel by HFBS. When the excitation threshold reaches a sufficient level, an acute block occurs first and after additional sub-threshold HFBS it is followed by a post-stimulation block. This study indicates that step-increases in sub-threshold HFBS intensity induces a gradual increase in axonal excitation threshold that may allow HFBS to block nerve conduction without generating an initial response. If this finding is proven to be true in human, it will significantly impact clinical applications of HFBS to treat chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.