Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800244›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

Evaluation of Usability and Satisfaction of Two Online Tools to Guide Return to Work for Cancer Survivors on the Cancer and Work Website.

Christine Maheu, Lucie Kocum, Maureen Parkinson, Lynne Robinson, Lori J Bernstein, Margareth Santos Zanchetta, Mina Singh, Claudia Hernandez, Fatima Yashmin, Mary Jane Esplen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christine MaheuFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada. christine.maheu@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8704-8207
Lucie KocumDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, B3H 3C3, Canada.
Maureen ParkinsonBC Cancer Agency, Patient & Family Counselling, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1G1, Canada.
Lynne RobinsonFaculty of Health, School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Lori J BernsteinPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Supportive Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Margareth Santos ZanchettaFaculty of Community Services, Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, M5B 1Z5, Canada.
Mina SinghFaculty of Health, School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Claudia HernandezPatient Partner from the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8, Canada.
Fatima YashminFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Mary Jane EsplenDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 3773231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prompt services and work-focused support systems are needed to aid cancer survivors returning to work or finding work. Purpose This knowledge translation and implementation project focused on the knowledge users' experience and need for refinement of three work-focused tools to support return to work and maintain work following cancer through their participation in a hands-on workshop. The tools assessed for their utility are a Job Analysis Tool (JAT), a Return to Work (RTW) tool, and a bilingual Canadian website on Cancer and Work. Methods Four workshops took place in three Canadian cities. Participants included cancer survivors, healthcare professionals, and employer representatives. Following an overview of the website and tools, workshop participants (N = 28) completed qualitative and quantitative satisfaction and usability questionnaires using the System Usability Scale and open-ended questions. Qualitative data was analyzed using content analyses from the think-aloud data and from the four open-ended questions collected during the users' use of the tools and website. Results Overall, most study participants reported high satisfaction with the JAT and RTW tools, the Cancer and work website and the workshop. Good usability scores were reported for the RTW planner (73.65 ± 12.61) and the website (74.83 ± 12.36), and only acceptable usability scores for the JAT (68.53 ± 11.90). Conclusion Overall, the study documented the value of the tools and the website to support the RTW process as assessed by several key knowledge user groups. The JAT is considered a helpful procedure to identify job demands in order to guide job accommodations. Given participants' responses that the tool is useful, the next steps are to implement the recommendations for improvement and knowledge dissemination to increase its uptake and the use of job analysis overall.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCanadaHumansPersonal SatisfactionReturn to WorkSurvivorsCancer and work websiteCancer rehabilitationCancer survivorshipReturn to workSatisfactionUsability

Identifiers

PMID34800244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.