Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800230›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2022

Structural and functional analysis of CCT family genes in pigeonpea.

Kishor U Tribhuvan, Tanvi Kaila, Harsha Srivastava, Antara Das, Kuldeep Kumar, Kumar Durgesh, Rekha Joshi, Binay K Singh, Nagendra K Singh, Kishor Gaikwad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-Wide Identification ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kishor U TribhuvanICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Tanvi KailaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Harsha SrivastavaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Antara DasICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture (CISH), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226101, India.
Kuldeep KumarICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Kumar DurgeshICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Rekha JoshiICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Binay K SinghICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (IIAB), Ranchi, Jharkhand, 834010, India.
Nagendra K SinghICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India.
Kishor GaikwadICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology (NIPB), New Delhi, Delhi, 110012, India. kish2012@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) is a photoperiod-sensitive short-day plant. Understanding the flowering-related genes is critical to developing photoperiod insensitive cultivars.

methodsThe CCT family genes were identified using 'CCT DOMAIN PROTEIN' as a keyword and localized on the chromosomes using the BLAST search option available at the LIS database. The centromeric positions were identified through BLAST search using the centromeric repeat sequence of C. cajan as a query against the chromosome-wise FASTA files downloaded from the NCBI database. The CCT family genes were classified based on additional domains and/or CCT domains. The orthologous and phylogenetic relationships were inferred using the OrthoFinder and MEGA 10.1 software, respectively. The CCT family genes' expression level in photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive genotypes was compared using RNA-seq data and qRT-PCR analysis.

resultsWe identified 33 CCT family genes in C. cajan distributed on ten chromosomes and nine genomic scaffolds. They were classified into CMF-type, COL-type, PRR-type, and GTCC- type. The CCT family genes of legumes exhibited an extensive orthologous relationship. Glycine max showed the maximum similarity of CCT family genes with C. cajan. The expression analysis of CCT family genes using photoperiod insensitive (ICP20338) and photoperiod sensitive (MAL3) genotypes of C. cajan demonstrated that CcCCT4 and CcCCT23 are the active CONSTANS in ICP20338. In contrast, only CcCCT23 is active in MAL3.

conclusionThe CCT family genes in C. cajan vary considerably in structure and domain types. They are maximally similar to soybean's CCT family genes. The differential photoperiod response of pigeonpea genotypes, ICP20338 and MAL3, is possibly due to the difference in the number and types of active CONSTANS in them.

Indexed as

CajanusChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeMultigene FamilyPhotoperiodPhylogenyPlant ProteinsProtein DomainsPlant ProteinsCCT family genesFlowering-related genesPhotoperiod sensitivityPigeonpea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.