Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800220›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Measuring symptoms severity in carpal tunnel syndrome: score agreement and responsiveness of the Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston symptom severity scale.

Kamelia Möllestam, Roberto S Rosales, Per-Erik Lyrén, Isam Atroshi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05927896 (Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the 6-item Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptoms Scale), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05927896 completednot on this map

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the 6-item Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptoms Scale

TypeobservationalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome, Symptoms and SignsArms6-item Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptoms Scale
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Carpal tunnel syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamelia MöllestamDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund - Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. kamelia.mollestam@skane.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-9676
Roberto S RosalesHand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, GECOT, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Per-Erik LyrénDepartment of Applied Educational Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Isam AtroshiDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund - Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess score agreement between the Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston 11-item symptom severity scale and compare their responsiveness in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome before and after carpal tunnel release surgery.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 3 cohorts that completed the A-L and Boston scales (conventional score 1-5) on the same occasion: a preoperative and short-term postoperative cohort (212 patients), a mid-term postoperative cohort (101 patients), and a long-term postoperative cohort (124 patients). Agreement was assessed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Analyses using item response theory were conducted on responses from the preoperative/short-term postoperative cohort including testing of item infit/outfit. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach alpha. Overall and sex-specific effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.

resultsLin's CCCs were high (0.81-0.91). Passing-Bablok analysis showed constant and proportional differences in all cohorts except preoperative to short-term postoperative change. Both scales showed high reliability (alpha, 0.88-0.93). The IRT-based analyses showed infit/outfit values within the desired range. With IRT-based scoring, the A-L scale had significantly higher responsiveness than the Boston scale, overall (d, 2.02 vs 1.59), in women (d, 2.22 vs 1.77) and in men (d, 1.74 vs 1.36).

conclusionThe Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston 11-item symptom severity scale show good agreement but are not equivalent in measuring CTS-related symptoms severity. When using IRT-based scoring, the Atroshi-Lyrén scale demonstrated significantly higher responsiveness.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesCarpal tunnel release surgeryCarpal tunnel syndromeItem response theoryPatient-reported outcome measuresSymptom severity scale

Identifiers

PMID34800220
PMCPMC9023404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.