ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Quality of life following awake surgery depends on ability of executive function, verbal fluency, and movement.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Postsurgical motor function and processing speed as predictors of quality of life in patients with chronic-phase glioblastoma.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Brain Plasticity Profiling as a Key Support to Therapeutic Decision-Making in Low-Grade Glioma Oncological Strategies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Dynamics in cognition and health-related quality of life in grade 2 and 3 gliomas after surgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Observational
- Level I and II deficits-A clinical survey on international practice of awake craniotomy and definitions of postoperative "major" and "minor" deficits.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe outcome of awake surgery has been evaluated based on functional factors, return to work, and oncological aspects, and there have been no reports directly examining QOL. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of QOL following awake surgery and to determine the functional factors influencing QOL.
methodsSeventy patients with WHO grade II/III gliomas were included. For the assessment of QOL, we used the SF-36 and calculated summary and sub-component scores. Three summary component scores, including physical (PCS), mental (MCS), and role/social summary (RCS) component scores, were computed based on sub-component scores. Additionally, various assessments of neurological/neuropsychological function were performed. We performed univariate and multiple regression analyses to investigate the functional factors influencing the SF-36.
resultsPCS and MCS were maintained, but only RCS was low to 42.0 ± 16.1. We then focused on the RCS and its sub-components: general health (GH), role physical (RP), social functioning (SF), and role emotional (RE). Multiple regression analysis showed following significant correlations between the sub-component scores and brain functions: GH to executive function and movement (p = 0.0033 and 0.032), RP to verbal fluency and movement (p = 0.0057 and 0.0010), and RE to verbal fluency (p = 0.020). Furthermore, when the sub-component scores were compared between groups with and without functional deficits related to GH, RP, and RE, each score was significantly lower in the groups with functional deficits (p = 0.012, 0.014, and 0.0049, respectively).
conclusionsIn patients who underwent awake surgery, a subset of patients had low QOL because of poor RCS. Functional factors influencing QOL included executive function, verbal fluency, and movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34800211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.