Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800179›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2021

Machine learning-based CT radiomics approach for predicting WHO/ISUP nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory and comparative study.

Yingjie Xv, Fajin Lv, Haoming Guo, Xiang Zhou, Hao Tan, Mingzhao Xiao, Yineng Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingjie Xv *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China.
Fajin Lv *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China.
Haoming GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China.
Hao TanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China.
Mingzhao XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China. xmz.2004@163.com.
Yineng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, Yuzhong, China. yinengzheng@cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1698-6399
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

chongqing municipal health committee foundation project CQYC2020020318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the predictive performance of machine learning-based CT radiomics for differentiating between low- and high-nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs).

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 406 patients with pathologically confirmed low- and high-nuclear grade of CCRCCs according to the WHO/ISUP grading system, which were divided into the training and testing cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from nephrographic-phase CT images using PyRadiomics. A support vector machine (SVM) combined with three feature selection algorithms such as least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), recursive feature elimination (RFE), and ReliefF was performed to determine the most suitable classification model, respectively. Clinicoradiological, radiomics, and combined models were constructed using the radiological and clinical characteristics with significant differences between the groups, selected radiomics features, and a combination of both, respectively. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses.

resultsSVM-ReliefF algorithm outperformed SVM-LASSO and SVM-RFE in distinguishing low- from high-grade CCRCCs. The combined model showed better prediction performance than the clinicoradiological and radiomics models (p < 0.05, DeLong test), which achieved the highest efficacy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.887 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.798-0.952), 0.859 (95% CI 0.748-0.935), and 0.828 (95% CI 0.731-0.929) in the training, validation, and testing cohorts, respectively. The calibration and decision curves also indicated the favorable performance of the combined model.

conclusionA combined model incorporating the radiomics features and clinicoradiological characteristics can better predict the WHO/ISUP nuclear grade of CCRCC preoperatively, thus providing effective and noninvasive assessment.

Indexed as

Clear cell renal cell carcinomaMachine learningPrediction modelTomography (X-ray computed)WHO/ISUP grading

Identifiers

PMID34800179
PMCPMC8605949
OpenAlexW3213744491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.