Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800100›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of oncology nursing2021

Clinical Trial Participation: A Pilot Study of Patient-Identified Barriers.

Mishellene McKinney, Rose Bell, Cindy Samborski, Kristopher Attwood, Grace Dean, Katherine Eakle, Wei Yu, Stephen Edge

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05398471 (Observational Clinical Trial Appraising Medical Trial Experiences of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Participating In Clinical Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05398471 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Observational Clinical Trial Appraising Medical Trial Experiences of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Participating In Clinical Research

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  4. Perceptions of health research participation in rural and urban Pennsylvanians.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  5. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of a Japanese Scale that Evaluates the Level of Nursing Support Provided to Patients for Decision-Making in Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  16. Benefits of Participation in Clinical Trials: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mishellene McKinney
Rose Bell
Cindy Samborski
Kristopher Attwood
Grace Dean
Katherine Eakle
Wei Yu
Stephen Edge

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trial enrollment in the United States is lacking, particularly among older adult and ethnic and racial minority populations.

objectivesThe aim of the current study was to identify patient-related barriers to clinical trial participation using a mixed-methods patient survey and to offer insights to develop evidence-based implementation strategies to address these barriers.

methodsA retrospective survey was conducted of patients who were not interested in participating in a clinical trial to quantify the reasons these patients chose not to participate. Directed qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes that emerged from the write-in responses.

findingsThe greatest patient-reported barriers were misperceptions about placebos, a desire to not feel like a human guinea pig, uncertainty surrounding clinical trial treatment effectiveness compared to standard care, and concerns about additional appointments or tests. Oncology nurses can address patient enrollment barriers by providing targeted education and participating in the informed consent process.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionAgedHumansInformed ConsentMinority GroupsPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesclinical trialenrollmentmixed-methods surveypatient-related barriers

Identifiers

PMID34800100
PMCPMC10150445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.