ArticleFEBS open bio2022
The composition of the lung microbiome differs between patients with dermatomyositis and rheumatoid arthritis associated with interstitial lung disease.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiome in connective tissue diseases associated interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis and immune regulation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: from basic research to clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Exploring microbial signatures in sarcoidosis: etiological and therapeutic implications of host-microbiota interactions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The lung microbiome in interstitial lung disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Role of the Microbiome in Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Critical Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Genetic association and bidirectional Mendelian randomization for causality between gut microbiota and six lung diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Lung microbiome alterations in patients with anti-Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- The Role of the Microbiome in Connective-Tissue-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease and Pulmonary Vasculitis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- The composition of the lung microbiome differs between patients with dermatomyositis and rheumatoid arthritis associated with interstitial lung disease.FEBS open bio · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatomyositis and rheumatoid arthritis are inflammatory diseases that affect the skeletal muscles and joints, respectively. A common systemic complication of these diseases is interstitial lung disease (ILD), which leads to a poor prognosis and increased mortality. However, the mechanism for the initiation and development of ILD in patients with dermatomyositis is currently unknown. In the present study, we used 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing to profile the bacterial community composition of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with dermatomyositis associated with ILD (DM-ILD; shortened to DM below), rheumatoid arthritis associated with ILD (RA-ILD; shortened to RA below) and healthy controls (N) aiming to understand the differences in their lung microbiota and to predict gene function. We found that there were more operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the lung microbiota of both RA and DM compared to N, although there was no significant difference in the number of OTUs between RA and DM. Similarly, the diversity in alphaproteobacteria differed between RA and DM compared to N, but not between RA and DM. The lung microbiota of RA, DM and N was mainly comprised of five phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria, with 10 dominant genera. Despite the similarity in microbiota composition, we also identified 41 OTUs of lung microbiota that differed among RA, DM and N. Additionally, linear discriminant analysis effect size and linear discriminant analysis genus scores confirmed that 31 microbial biomarkers were clearly distinguished among RA, DM and N. The functional and metabolic alterations of the lung microbiota among RA, DM and N were predicted using picrust, and differentially abundant KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways were identified. Research on the lung microbiota of patients with DM and RA may open new opportunities for developing biomarkers to identify high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.