Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800082›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability.

Abigail S L Lewis, Whitney M Woelmer, Heather L Wander, Dexter W Howard, John W Smith, Ryan P McClure, Mary E Lofton, Nicholas W Hammond, Rachel S Corrigan, R Quinn Thomas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What can we learn from 100,000 freshwater forecasts? A synthesis from the NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abigail S L LewisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9933-4542
Whitney M WoelmerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5147-3877
Heather L WanderDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-6045
Dexter W HowardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6118-2149
John W SmithDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1564-3290
Ryan P McClureDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6370-3852
Mary E LoftonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-1330
Nicholas W HammondDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-8280
Rachel S CorriganDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-8085
R Quinn ThomasDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-7825
Cayelan C CareyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-4476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Near-term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross-ecosystem analysis of near-term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near-term (≤10-yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near-term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near-term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near-term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1-7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables.

Indexed as

EcosystemForecastingChlorophyllPhytoplanktonPlant TranspirationPollenUncertaintyChlorophylldata assimilationdecision supportecological predictabilityforecast automationforecast evaluationforecast horizonforecast uncertaintyiterative forecastingnear-term forecastnull modelopen scienceuncertainty partitioning

Identifiers

PMID34800082
PMCPMC9285336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.