Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799957›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Widespread effects of dMRI data quality on diffusion measures in children.

Nabin Koirala, Daniel Kleinman, Meaghan V Perdue, Xing Su, Martina Villa, Elena L Grigorenko, Nicole Landi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Structural Brain Correlates of Poor Reading Comprehension.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementing ABCD studyMethodsX · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nabin KoiralaHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8261-8271
Daniel KleinmanHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Meaghan V PerdueHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Xing SuHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Martina VillaHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Elena L GrigorenkoHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicole LandiHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRIS W SCHATSCHNEIDER · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
Effectiveness and predictors of response for a technology-based reading intervention in the homeR01HD101842 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI LANDI, NICOLE, MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101842NIH HHS NIH 2P50HD052120-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) datasets are susceptible to several confounding factors related to data quality, which is especially true in studies involving young children. With the recent trend of large-scale multicenter studies, it is more critical to be aware of the varied impacts of data quality on measures of interest. Here, we investigated data quality and its effect on different diffusion measures using a multicenter dataset. dMRI data were obtained from 691 participants (5-17 years of age) from six different centers. Six data quality metrics-contrast to noise ratio, outlier slices, and motion (absolute, relative, translation, and rotational)-and four diffusion measures-fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, tract density, and length-were computed for each of 36 major fiber tracts for all participants. The results indicated that four out of six data quality metrics (all except absolute and translation motion) differed significantly between centers. Associations between these data quality metrics and the diffusion measures differed significantly across the tracts and centers. Moreover, these effects remained significant after applying recently proposed harmonization algorithms that purport to remove unwanted between-site variation in diffusion data. These results demonstrate the widespread impact of dMRI data quality on diffusion measures. These tracts and measures have been routinely associated with individual differences as well as group-wide differences between neurotypical populations and individuals with neurological or developmental disorders. Accordingly, for analyses of individual differences or group effects (particularly in multisite dataset), we encourage the inclusion of data quality metrics in dMRI analysis.

Indexed as

Multicenter Studies as TopicAdolescentBrainChildChild, PreschoolDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMalecontrast to noise ratiodiffusion data qualitydiffusion measuresmotion artifactsmulticenter data

Identifiers

PMID34799957
PMCPMC8837592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.