Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799828›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Confidence of UK Ophthalmology Registrars in Managing Posterior Capsular Rupture: Results from a National Trainee Survey.

Andrew J Swampillai, Victoria A Nowak, Laura Maubon, James E Neffendorf, Dilraj Sahota, Olayinka Williams, Bansri Lakhani, Cristina Soare, Ivan Sychev, Edward Ridyard and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Objective structured assessment of posterior capsular rupture management.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J SwampillaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Parkfield Drive, Taunton, TA1 5DA, Somerset, UK.
Victoria A Nowak *Royal Free London Hospital, London, UK.
Laura Maubon *St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
James E NeffendorfOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Dilraj SahotaQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Olayinka WilliamsGartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Bansri LakhaniQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Cristina SoareSt. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Ivan SychevManchester Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Edward RidyardSt. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Praveen J PatelNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Jonathan C ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Parkfield Drive, Taunton, TA1 5DA, Somerset, UK. Jonathan.Park@SomersetFT.nhs.uk.
Ophthalmology Trainee Clinical Research Network
Gartnavel General Hospital · GBMusgrove Park Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBManchester Royal Eye Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R000735/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo establish the level of confidence amongst UK ophthalmology specialist registrars (residents) in managing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery.

methodsAn online nine-item questionnaire was distributed to all registrars, recruited nationwide via regional representatives. Data collected included stage of training, number of completed cataract operations, cumulative PCR rate, number of PCRs independently managed, understanding of vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters and access to simulation. Respondents self-evaluated their confidence in managing PCR with vitreous loss.

resultsComplete responses were obtained from 248 registrars (35% response rate). Mean number of phacoemulsification procedures performed was 386. For senior registrars (OST 6-7), 35 out of 70 (50%) felt confident to manage PCR independently and 55 out of 70 (78.6%) were either quite confident or very confident at deciding when to implant an intraocular lens during PCR management. Lower confidence levels were noted for junior trainees (OST 1-2). Over 65% of survey respondents had access to relevant simulation.

conclusionsOur results represent the largest UK survey analysing the confidence of PCR management amongst registrars. Confidence improves with duration of training and increased exposure to management of PCR. However, 50% of senior registrars still lacked confidence to independently manage PCR and vitreous loss. A specific competency-based framework, potentially using a simulator or simulating a PCR event, incorporated into the curriculum may be desirable.

Indexed as

Cataract surgeryComplicationsPhacoemulsificationSimulationTrainingVitrectomyVitreous loss

Identifiers

PMID34799828
PMCPMC8770778
OpenAlexW3212932122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.