Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799707›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2022

Foveal microstructure and visual function in patients with lamellar macular hole, epiretinal membrane foveoschisis or macular pseudohole.

Kentaro Nakamura, Tatsuya Inoue, Koichi Nagura, Yui Tanaka, Rei Arasaki, Ryo Asaoka, Yasuo Yanagi, Maiko Maruyama-Inoue, Kazuaki Kadonosono

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Retinal displacement after surgery for idiopathic macular hole.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical characteristics of patients with epiretinal membrane-Foveoschisis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kentaro NakamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuya InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan. inouet-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-0222
Koichi NaguraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yui TanakaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Rei ArasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryo AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yasuo YanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-7285
Maiko Maruyama-InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuaki KadonosonoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPSeirei Christopher University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the foveal microstructures, such as the prevalence of epiretinal proliferation (EP) and residual ellipsoid zone (EZ), in eyes with lamellar macular hole (LMH), epiretinal retinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis and macular pseudohole (MPH), and to investigate the association of the foveal microstructure with visual functions.

methodIn addition to the prevalence of EP, we calculated the residual EZ index within 1mm and 3 mm (rEZ1 and rEZ3) in all examined eyes. Comparisons were conducted to baseline characteristics (logMAR visual acuity [logMAR VA], metamorphopsia score [Mave], central retinal thickness [CRT], the prevalence of EP, rEZ1 and rEZ3) between MPH, ERM foveoschisis and LMH subgroups. The relationships (1) between logMAR VA and each of age, type (MPH, ERM foveoschisis and LMH), the prevalence of EP, rEZ1, rEZ3, spherical equivalent (SE) and CRT and (2) between Mave and each of variables were investigated.

resultsFifty-one eyes of 48 patients were enroled. The mean age was 65.2 ± 11.1 years. Ten eyes were diagnosed as LMH, 22 eyes as ERM foveoschisis and 19 eyes as MPH, respectively. There was a significant difference in CRT only between LMH and ERM foveoschisis (p = 0.023). There was a tendency toward significance in rEZ1 between LMH and ERM foveoschisis (p = 0.057), but not in rEZ3. The optimal model for logMAR VA included age, rEZ1, SE and CRT. On the other hand, the optimal model for Mave included the prevalence of EP, rEZ1 and SE.

conclusionMicrostructural observations are useful to predict visual functions in LMH, ERM foveoshisis and MPH.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneRetinal PerforationsAgedFovea CentralisHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID34799707
PMCPMC9674578
OpenAlexW3211853906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.