ArticleScientific reports2021
Identification of ligand binding sites in intrinsically disordered proteins with a differential binding score.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a unified framework for determining conformational ensembles of disordered proteins.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Current perspectives in drug targeting intrinsically disordered proteins and biomolecular condensates.BMC biology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening ligands directly binding to an ensemble of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) to discover potential hits or leads for new drugs is an emerging but challenging area as IDPs lack well-defined and ordered 3D-protein structures. To explore a new IDP-based rational drug discovery strategy, a differential binding score (DIBS) is defined. The basis of DIBS is to quantitatively determine the binding preference of a ligand to an ensemble of conformations specified by IDP versus such preferences to an ensemble of random coil conformations of the same protein. Ensemble docking procedures performed on repeated sampling of conformations, and the results tested for statistical significance determine the preferential ligand binding sites of the IDP. The results of this approach closely reproduce the experimental data from recent literature on the binding of the ligand epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) to the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of the tumor suppressor p53. Combining established approaches in developing a new method to screen ligands against IDPs could be valuable as a screening tool for IDP-based drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.