Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799411›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Minimizing Iridium Oxide Electrodes for High Visual Acuity Subretinal Stimulation.

Samir Damle, Maya Carleton, Theodoros Kapogianis, Shaurya Arya, Melina Cavichini-Corderio, William R Freeman, Yu-Hwa Lo, Nicholas W Oesch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Inhibitory Circuits Can Restore OFF Pathway Responses in Retinal Prostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samir DamleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Maya CarletonDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Theodoros KapogianisDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Shaurya AryaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161.
Melina Cavichini-CorderioJacobs Retina Center at Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
William R FreemanJacobs Retina Center at Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Yu-Hwa LoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161.
Nicholas W OeschDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 noesch@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-0741
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Computing Luminance and Contrast in Prosthetically Driven RetinaR01EY029259 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Nicholas Oesch · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision loss from diseases of the outer retina, such as age-related macular degeneration, is among the leading causes of irreversible blindness in the world today. The goal of retinal prosthetics is to replace the photo-sensing function of photoreceptors lost in these diseases with optoelectronic hardware to electrically stimulate patterns of retinal activity corresponding to vision. To enable high-resolution retinal prosthetics, the scale of stimulating electrodes must be significantly decreased from current designs; however, this reduces the amount of stimulating current that can be delivered. The efficacy of subretinal stimulation at electrode sizes suitable for high visual acuity retinal prosthesis are not well understood, particularly within the safe charge injection limits of electrode materials. Here, we measure retinal ganglion cell (RGC) responses in a mouse model of blindness to evaluate the stimulation efficacy of 10, 20, and 30 μm diameter iridium oxide electrodes within the electrode charge injection limits, focusing on measures of charge threshold and dynamic range. Stimulation thresholds were lower for smaller electrodes, but larger electrodes could elicit a greater dynamic range of spikes and recruited more ganglion cells within charge injection limits. These findings suggest a practical lower limit for planar electrode size and indicate strategies for maximizing stimulation thresholds and dynamic range.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisAnimalsElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedIridiumMiceMicroelectrodesRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual AcuityIridiumiridium oxideblindnesselectrical stimulationneural stimulationprostheticretinaretinal prosthetic

Identifiers

PMID34799411
PMCPMC8704424
OpenAlexW3212539261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.