Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799410›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Rapid Analysis of Visual Receptive Fields by Iterative Tomography.

Calvin D Eiber, Jin Y Huang, Spencer C Chen, Natalie Zeater, Alexander N J Pietersen, Dario A Protti, Paul R Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Calvin D EiberSave Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8240-2649
Jin Y HuangSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006 Australia.
Spencer C ChenAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia.
Natalie ZeaterSave Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia.
Alexander N J PietersenSave Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia.
Dario A ProttiSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006 Australia.
Paul R MartinSave Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia paul.martin@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-9658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many receptive fields in the early visual system show standard (center-surround) structure and can be analyzed using simple drifting patterns and a difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) model, which treats the receptive field as a linear filter of the visual image. But many other receptive fields show nonlinear properties such as selectivity for direction of movement. Such receptive fields are typically studied using discrete stimuli (moving or flashed bars and edges) and are modelled according to the features of the visual image to which they are most sensitive. Here, we harness recent advances in tomographic image analysis to characterize rapidly and simultaneously both the linear and nonlinear components of visual receptive fields. Spiking and intracellular voltage potential responses to briefly flashed bars are analyzed using non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) and iterative reconstruction tomography (IRT). The method yields high-resolution receptive field maps of individual neurons and neuron ensembles in primate (marmoset, both sexes) lateral geniculate and rodent (mouse, male) retina. We show that the first two IRT components correspond to DoG-equivalent center and surround of standard [magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P)] receptive fields in primate geniculate. The first two IRT components also reveal the spatiotemporal receptive field structure of nonstandard (on/off-rectifying) receptive fields. In rodent retina we combine NNMF-IRT with patch-clamp recording and dye injection to directly map spatial receptive fields to the underlying anatomy of retinal output neurons. We conclude that NNMF-IRT provides a rapid and flexible framework for study of receptive fields in the early visual system.

Indexed as

Geniculate BodiesVisual FieldsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceNeuronsPhotic StimulationTomographyVisual Pathwayslateral geniculate nucleusmarmosetreceptive fieldretinasensory codingvision

Identifiers

PMID34799410
PMCPMC8658541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.