Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799142›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Meeting report: CEPI consultation on accelerating access to novel vaccines against emerging infectious diseases for pregnant and lactating women, London, 12-13 February 2020.

Gerald Voss, Jeanne-Marie Jacquet, Nadia Tornieporth, Beate Kampmann, Ruth Karron, Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen, Robert Chen, Marion Gruber, Nicole Lurie, Charlie Weller and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Pregnancy and medicines: time for paradigm change.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Gerald VossCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK. Electronic address: Gerald.voss@cepi.net.
Jeanne-Marie JacquetCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK.
Nadia TornieporthUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hanover, Germany.
Beate KampmannThe Vaccine Centre, Faculty of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ruth KarronCenter for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter MeulenBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert ChenBrighton Collaboration, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Marion GruberOffice of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Nicole LurieCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK.
Charlie WellerVaccines Programme, Wellcome Trust, London, UK.
Jakob P CramerCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK.
Melanie SavilleCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK.
Mimi DarkoFood and Drugs Authority, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USJohns Hopkins University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Food and Agriculture · GHThe Task Force for Global Health · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases may cause serious morbidity and mortality in pregnant women, their foetuses, and infants; the risk associated with any newly emerging infectious disease (EID) is likely unknown at the time of its emergence. While the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic shows that the development of vaccines against new pathogens can be considerably accelerated, the immunization of pregnant women generally lags behind the general population. Guided by the priority pathogen list for WHO's R&D Blueprint for Action to Prevent Epidemics, this workshop sought to define the evidence needed for use of vaccines against EIDs in pregnant and lactating women, using Lassa fever as a model. Close to 60 maternal immunization (MI) and vaccine safety experts, regulators, vaccine developers, Lassa fever experts, and investigators from Lassa-affected countries examined the critical steps for vaccine development and immunization decisions for pregnant and lactating women. This paper reports on key themes and recommendations from the workshop. Current practice still assumes the exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials. A shift in paradigm is needed to progress towards initial inclusion of pregnant women in Phase 2 and 3 trials. Several practical avenues were delineated. Participants agreed that vaccine platforms should be assessed early for their suitability for maternal immunization. It was noted that, in some cases, nonclinical data derived from assessing a given platform using other antigens may be adequate evidence to proceed to a first clinical evaluation and that concurrence from regulators may be sought with supporting rationale. For clinical trials, essential prerequisites such as documenting the disease burden in pregnant women, study site infrastructure, capabilities, and staff experience were noted. Early and sustained communication with the local community was considered paramount in any program for the conduct of MI trials and planned vaccine introduction.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingCOVID-19VaccinesFemaleHumansLactationLondonPregnancyReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Vaccine DevelopmentVaccinesEmerging infectious diseasesLassa virus feverMaternal immunizationPregnancyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34799142
PMCPMC8595925
OpenAlexW3214711008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.